Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Practice Exams
Last updated on Oct 09,2026- Exam Code: Professional Machine Learning Engineer
- Exam Name: Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer
- Certification Provider: Google
- Latest update: Oct 09,2026
Question #141
You are an ML engineer responsible for designing and implementing training pipelines for ML models. You need to create an end-to-end training pipeline for a TensorFlow model. The TensorFlow model will be trained on several terabytes of structured data. You need the pipeline to include data quality checks before training and model quality checks after training but prior to deployment. You want to minimize development time and the need for infrastructure maintenance.
How should you build and orchestrate your training pipeline?
- A . Create the pipeline using Kubeflow Pipelines domain-specific language (DSL) and predefined Google Cloud components. Orchestrate the pipeline using Vertex AI Pipelines.
- B . Create the pipeline using TensorFlow Extended (TFX) and standard TFX components. Orchestrate the pipeline using Vertex AI Pipelines.
- C . Create the pipeline using Kubeflow Pipelines domain-specific language (DSL) and predefined Google Cloud components. Orchestrate the pipeline using Kubeflow Pipelines deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine.
- D . Create the pipeline using TensorFlow Extended (TFX) and standard TFX components. Orchestrate the pipeline using Kubeflow Pipelines deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine.
Correct Answer: B
B
Explanation:
The best option for creating and orchestrating an end-to-end training pipeline for a TensorFlow model is to use TensorFlow Extended (TFX) and standard TFX components, and deploy the pipeline to Vertex AI Pipelines. TFX is an end-to-end platform for deploying production ML pipelines, which consists of several built-in components that cover the entire ML lifecycle, from data ingestion and validation, to model training and evaluation, to model deployment and monitoring. TFX also supports custom components and integrations with other Google Cloud services, such as BigQuery, Dataflow, and Cloud Storage. Vertex AI Pipelines is a fully managed service that allows you to run TFX pipelines on Google Cloud, without having to worry about infrastructure provisioning, scaling, or maintenance. Vertex AI Pipelines also provides a user-friendly interface to monitor and manage your pipelines, as well as tools to track and compare experiments. The other options are not as suitable for creating and orchestrating an end-to-end training pipeline for a TensorFlow model, because: Creating the pipeline using Kubeflow Pipelines domain-specific language (DSL) and predefined Google Cloud components would require more development time and effort, as Kubeflow Pipelines DSL is not as expressive or compatible with TensorFlow as TFX. Predefined Google Cloud components might not cover all the stages of the ML lifecycle, and might not be optimized for TensorFlow models. Orchestrating the pipeline using Kubeflow Pipelines deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine would require more infrastructure maintenance, as Kubeflow Pipelines is not a fully managed service, and you would have to provision and manage your own Kubernetes cluster. This would also incur more costs, as you would have to pay for the cluster resources, regardless of the pipeline usage.
Reference: TFX | ML Production Pipelines | TensorFlow
Vertex AI Pipelines | Google Cloud
Kubeflow Pipelines | Google Cloud
Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification
Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Certification
Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide
B
Explanation:
The best option for creating and orchestrating an end-to-end training pipeline for a TensorFlow model is to use TensorFlow Extended (TFX) and standard TFX components, and deploy the pipeline to Vertex AI Pipelines. TFX is an end-to-end platform for deploying production ML pipelines, which consists of several built-in components that cover the entire ML lifecycle, from data ingestion and validation, to model training and evaluation, to model deployment and monitoring. TFX also supports custom components and integrations with other Google Cloud services, such as BigQuery, Dataflow, and Cloud Storage. Vertex AI Pipelines is a fully managed service that allows you to run TFX pipelines on Google Cloud, without having to worry about infrastructure provisioning, scaling, or maintenance. Vertex AI Pipelines also provides a user-friendly interface to monitor and manage your pipelines, as well as tools to track and compare experiments. The other options are not as suitable for creating and orchestrating an end-to-end training pipeline for a TensorFlow model, because: Creating the pipeline using Kubeflow Pipelines domain-specific language (DSL) and predefined Google Cloud components would require more development time and effort, as Kubeflow Pipelines DSL is not as expressive or compatible with TensorFlow as TFX. Predefined Google Cloud components might not cover all the stages of the ML lifecycle, and might not be optimized for TensorFlow models. Orchestrating the pipeline using Kubeflow Pipelines deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine would require more infrastructure maintenance, as Kubeflow Pipelines is not a fully managed service, and you would have to provision and manage your own Kubernetes cluster. This would also incur more costs, as you would have to pay for the cluster resources, regardless of the pipeline usage.
Reference: TFX | ML Production Pipelines | TensorFlow
Vertex AI Pipelines | Google Cloud
Kubeflow Pipelines | Google Cloud
Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification
Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Certification
Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide
Question #142
You work for a rapidly growing social media company. Your team builds TensorFlow recommender models in an on-premises CPU cluster. The data contains billions of historical user events and 100 000 categorical features. You notice that as the data increases the model training time increases. You plan to move the models to Google Cloud You want to use the most scalable approach that also minimizes training time.
What should you do?
- A . Deploy the training jobs by using TPU VMs with TPUv3 Pod slices, and use the TPUEmbedding API.
- B . Deploy the training jobs in an autoscaling Google Kubernetes Engine cluster with CPUs
- C . Deploy a matrix factorization model training job by using BigQuery ML.
- D . Deploy the training jobs by using Compute Engine instances with A100 GPUs and use the t f. nn. embedding_lookup API.
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
TPU VMs with TPUv3 Pod slices are the most scalable and performant option for training large-scale recommender models on Google Cloud. TPUv3 Pods can provide up to 2048 cores and 32 TB of memory, and can process billions of examples and features in minutes. The TPUEmbedding API is designed to efficiently handle large-scale categorical features and embeddings, and can reduce the memory footprint and communication overhead of the model. The other options are either less scalable (B and C) or less efficient (D) for this use case.
A
Explanation:
TPU VMs with TPUv3 Pod slices are the most scalable and performant option for training large-scale recommender models on Google Cloud. TPUv3 Pods can provide up to 2048 cores and 32 TB of memory, and can process billions of examples and features in minutes. The TPUEmbedding API is designed to efficiently handle large-scale categorical features and embeddings, and can reduce the memory footprint and communication overhead of the model. The other options are either less scalable (B and C) or less efficient (D) for this use case.
Question #142
You work for a rapidly growing social media company. Your team builds TensorFlow recommender models in an on-premises CPU cluster. The data contains billions of historical user events and 100 000 categorical features. You notice that as the data increases the model training time increases. You plan to move the models to Google Cloud You want to use the most scalable approach that also minimizes training time.
What should you do?
- A . Deploy the training jobs by using TPU VMs with TPUv3 Pod slices, and use the TPUEmbedding API.
- B . Deploy the training jobs in an autoscaling Google Kubernetes Engine cluster with CPUs
- C . Deploy a matrix factorization model training job by using BigQuery ML.
- D . Deploy the training jobs by using Compute Engine instances with A100 GPUs and use the t f. nn. embedding_lookup API.
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
TPU VMs with TPUv3 Pod slices are the most scalable and performant option for training large-scale recommender models on Google Cloud. TPUv3 Pods can provide up to 2048 cores and 32 TB of memory, and can process billions of examples and features in minutes. The TPUEmbedding API is designed to efficiently handle large-scale categorical features and embeddings, and can reduce the memory footprint and communication overhead of the model. The other options are either less scalable (B and C) or less efficient (D) for this use case.
A
Explanation:
TPU VMs with TPUv3 Pod slices are the most scalable and performant option for training large-scale recommender models on Google Cloud. TPUv3 Pods can provide up to 2048 cores and 32 TB of memory, and can process billions of examples and features in minutes. The TPUEmbedding API is designed to efficiently handle large-scale categorical features and embeddings, and can reduce the memory footprint and communication overhead of the model. The other options are either less scalable (B and C) or less efficient (D) for this use case.
Question #144
You work for a telecommunications company You’re building a model to predict which customers may fail to pay their next phone bill. The purpose of this model is to proactively offer at-risk customers assistance such as service discounts and bill deadline extensions.
The data is stored in BigQuery, and the predictive features that are available for model training include
– Customer_id -Age
– Salary (measured in local currency) -Sex
– Average bill value (measured in local currency)
– Number of phone calls in the last month (integer)
– Average duration of phone calls (measured in minutes)
You need to investigate and mitigate potential bias against disadvantaged groups while preserving model accuracy What should you do?
- A . Determine whether there is a meaningful correlation between the sensitive features and the other features Train a BigQuery ML boosted trees classification model and exclude the sensitive features and any meaningfully correlated features
- B . Train a BigQuery ML boosted trees classification model with all features Use the ml. global explain method to calculate the global attribution values for each feature of the model If the feature importance value for any of the sensitive features exceeds a threshold, discard the model and tram without this feature
- C . Train a BigQuery ML boosted trees classification model with all features Use the ml. exflain_predict method to calculate the attribution values for each feature for each customer in a test set If for any individual customer the importance value for any feature exceeds a predefined threshold, discard the model and train the model again without this feature.
- D . Define a fairness metric that is represented by accuracy across the sensitive features Train a BigQuery ML boosted trees classification model with all features Use the trained model to make predictions on a test set Join the data back with the sensitive features, and calculate a fairness metric to investigate whether it meets your requirements.
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
A fairness metric is a way to measure how well a machine learning model treats different groups of customers, such as by sex or age. A common fairness metric is accuracy, which is the proportion of correct predictions among all predictions. Accuracy across the sensitive features means calculating the accuracy for each group separately, and then comparing them. For example, if the model has 90% accuracy for male customers and 80% accuracy for female customers, there is a 10% accuracy gap that indicates potential bias against female customers.
To investigate and mitigate potential bias, it is important to define a fairness metric and evaluate it on a test set. A test set is a subset of the data that is not used for training the model, but only for evaluating its performance. By joining the test set predictions with the sensitive features, you can calculate the fairness metric and see if it meets your requirements. For example, you may require that the accuracy gap between any two groups is less than 5%. If the fairness metric does not meet your requirements, you may need to adjust the model or the data to reduce bias.
Option A is not the best answer because excluding the sensitive features and any meaningfully correlated features may not eliminate bias. For example, if salary is correlated with sex, and salary is also a predictive feature for the target variable, excluding both features may reduce the model accuracy and still leave some residual bias. Moreover, excluding features based on correlation may not capture the complex interactions and dependencies among the features that may affect bias.
Option B is not the best answer because using the global attribution values for each feature of the model may not reflect the individual-level impact of the features on the predictions. Global attribution values are calculated by averaging the attribution values across all the data points, and they indicate how important each feature is for the overall model performance. However, they do not show how each feature affects each customer’s prediction, which may vary depending on the values of the other features. For example, sex may have a low global attribution value, but it may have a high impact on some customers’ predictions, especially if it interacts with other features such as salary or age.
Option C is not the best answer because discarding the model and training the model again without a feature based on a single customer’s attribution value may not be a robust or scalable way to mitigate bias. Attribution values are calculated by measuring how much each feature contributes to the prediction for a given data point, and they indicate how sensitive the prediction is to the feature value. However, they do not show how the feature affects the overall fairness metric or the model accuracy. For example, sex may have a high attribution value for a customer, but it may not affect the accuracy gap between the groups. Moreover, discarding and retraining the model based on a single customer’s attribution value may not be feasible if there are many customers with high attribution values for different features.
D
Explanation:
A fairness metric is a way to measure how well a machine learning model treats different groups of customers, such as by sex or age. A common fairness metric is accuracy, which is the proportion of correct predictions among all predictions. Accuracy across the sensitive features means calculating the accuracy for each group separately, and then comparing them. For example, if the model has 90% accuracy for male customers and 80% accuracy for female customers, there is a 10% accuracy gap that indicates potential bias against female customers.
To investigate and mitigate potential bias, it is important to define a fairness metric and evaluate it on a test set. A test set is a subset of the data that is not used for training the model, but only for evaluating its performance. By joining the test set predictions with the sensitive features, you can calculate the fairness metric and see if it meets your requirements. For example, you may require that the accuracy gap between any two groups is less than 5%. If the fairness metric does not meet your requirements, you may need to adjust the model or the data to reduce bias.
Option A is not the best answer because excluding the sensitive features and any meaningfully correlated features may not eliminate bias. For example, if salary is correlated with sex, and salary is also a predictive feature for the target variable, excluding both features may reduce the model accuracy and still leave some residual bias. Moreover, excluding features based on correlation may not capture the complex interactions and dependencies among the features that may affect bias.
Option B is not the best answer because using the global attribution values for each feature of the model may not reflect the individual-level impact of the features on the predictions. Global attribution values are calculated by averaging the attribution values across all the data points, and they indicate how important each feature is for the overall model performance. However, they do not show how each feature affects each customer’s prediction, which may vary depending on the values of the other features. For example, sex may have a low global attribution value, but it may have a high impact on some customers’ predictions, especially if it interacts with other features such as salary or age.
Option C is not the best answer because discarding the model and training the model again without a feature based on a single customer’s attribution value may not be a robust or scalable way to mitigate bias. Attribution values are calculated by measuring how much each feature contributes to the prediction for a given data point, and they indicate how sensitive the prediction is to the feature value. However, they do not show how the feature affects the overall fairness metric or the model accuracy. For example, sex may have a high attribution value for a customer, but it may not affect the accuracy gap between the groups. Moreover, discarding and retraining the model based on a single customer’s attribution value may not be feasible if there are many customers with high attribution values for different features.
Question #144
You work for a telecommunications company You’re building a model to predict which customers may fail to pay their next phone bill. The purpose of this model is to proactively offer at-risk customers assistance such as service discounts and bill deadline extensions.
The data is stored in BigQuery, and the predictive features that are available for model training include
– Customer_id -Age
– Salary (measured in local currency) -Sex
– Average bill value (measured in local currency)
– Number of phone calls in the last month (integer)
– Average duration of phone calls (measured in minutes)
You need to investigate and mitigate potential bias against disadvantaged groups while preserving model accuracy What should you do?
- A . Determine whether there is a meaningful correlation between the sensitive features and the other features Train a BigQuery ML boosted trees classification model and exclude the sensitive features and any meaningfully correlated features
- B . Train a BigQuery ML boosted trees classification model with all features Use the ml. global explain method to calculate the global attribution values for each feature of the model If the feature importance value for any of the sensitive features exceeds a threshold, discard the model and tram without this feature
- C . Train a BigQuery ML boosted trees classification model with all features Use the ml. exflain_predict method to calculate the attribution values for each feature for each customer in a test set If for any individual customer the importance value for any feature exceeds a predefined threshold, discard the model and train the model again without this feature.
- D . Define a fairness metric that is represented by accuracy across the sensitive features Train a BigQuery ML boosted trees classification model with all features Use the trained model to make predictions on a test set Join the data back with the sensitive features, and calculate a fairness metric to investigate whether it meets your requirements.
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
A fairness metric is a way to measure how well a machine learning model treats different groups of customers, such as by sex or age. A common fairness metric is accuracy, which is the proportion of correct predictions among all predictions. Accuracy across the sensitive features means calculating the accuracy for each group separately, and then comparing them. For example, if the model has 90% accuracy for male customers and 80% accuracy for female customers, there is a 10% accuracy gap that indicates potential bias against female customers.
To investigate and mitigate potential bias, it is important to define a fairness metric and evaluate it on a test set. A test set is a subset of the data that is not used for training the model, but only for evaluating its performance. By joining the test set predictions with the sensitive features, you can calculate the fairness metric and see if it meets your requirements. For example, you may require that the accuracy gap between any two groups is less than 5%. If the fairness metric does not meet your requirements, you may need to adjust the model or the data to reduce bias.
Option A is not the best answer because excluding the sensitive features and any meaningfully correlated features may not eliminate bias. For example, if salary is correlated with sex, and salary is also a predictive feature for the target variable, excluding both features may reduce the model accuracy and still leave some residual bias. Moreover, excluding features based on correlation may not capture the complex interactions and dependencies among the features that may affect bias.
Option B is not the best answer because using the global attribution values for each feature of the model may not reflect the individual-level impact of the features on the predictions. Global attribution values are calculated by averaging the attribution values across all the data points, and they indicate how important each feature is for the overall model performance. However, they do not show how each feature affects each customer’s prediction, which may vary depending on the values of the other features. For example, sex may have a low global attribution value, but it may have a high impact on some customers’ predictions, especially if it interacts with other features such as salary or age.
Option C is not the best answer because discarding the model and training the model again without a feature based on a single customer’s attribution value may not be a robust or scalable way to mitigate bias. Attribution values are calculated by measuring how much each feature contributes to the prediction for a given data point, and they indicate how sensitive the prediction is to the feature value. However, they do not show how the feature affects the overall fairness metric or the model accuracy. For example, sex may have a high attribution value for a customer, but it may not affect the accuracy gap between the groups. Moreover, discarding and retraining the model based on a single customer’s attribution value may not be feasible if there are many customers with high attribution values for different features.
D
Explanation:
A fairness metric is a way to measure how well a machine learning model treats different groups of customers, such as by sex or age. A common fairness metric is accuracy, which is the proportion of correct predictions among all predictions. Accuracy across the sensitive features means calculating the accuracy for each group separately, and then comparing them. For example, if the model has 90% accuracy for male customers and 80% accuracy for female customers, there is a 10% accuracy gap that indicates potential bias against female customers.
To investigate and mitigate potential bias, it is important to define a fairness metric and evaluate it on a test set. A test set is a subset of the data that is not used for training the model, but only for evaluating its performance. By joining the test set predictions with the sensitive features, you can calculate the fairness metric and see if it meets your requirements. For example, you may require that the accuracy gap between any two groups is less than 5%. If the fairness metric does not meet your requirements, you may need to adjust the model or the data to reduce bias.
Option A is not the best answer because excluding the sensitive features and any meaningfully correlated features may not eliminate bias. For example, if salary is correlated with sex, and salary is also a predictive feature for the target variable, excluding both features may reduce the model accuracy and still leave some residual bias. Moreover, excluding features based on correlation may not capture the complex interactions and dependencies among the features that may affect bias.
Option B is not the best answer because using the global attribution values for each feature of the model may not reflect the individual-level impact of the features on the predictions. Global attribution values are calculated by averaging the attribution values across all the data points, and they indicate how important each feature is for the overall model performance. However, they do not show how each feature affects each customer’s prediction, which may vary depending on the values of the other features. For example, sex may have a low global attribution value, but it may have a high impact on some customers’ predictions, especially if it interacts with other features such as salary or age.
Option C is not the best answer because discarding the model and training the model again without a feature based on a single customer’s attribution value may not be a robust or scalable way to mitigate bias. Attribution values are calculated by measuring how much each feature contributes to the prediction for a given data point, and they indicate how sensitive the prediction is to the feature value. However, they do not show how the feature affects the overall fairness metric or the model accuracy. For example, sex may have a high attribution value for a customer, but it may not affect the accuracy gap between the groups. Moreover, discarding and retraining the model based on a single customer’s attribution value may not be feasible if there are many customers with high attribution values for different features.
Question #146
Your organization’s marketing team is building a customer recommendation chatbot that uses a generative AI large language model (LLM) to provide personalized product suggestions in real time. The chatbot needs to access data from millions of customers, including purchase history, browsing behavior, and preferences. The data is stored in a Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL database. You need the chatbot response time to be less than 100ms.
How should you design the system?
- A . Use BigQuery ML to fine-tune the LLM with the data in the Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL database, and access the model from BigQuery.
- B . Replicate the Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL database to AlloyDB. Configure the chatbot server to query AlloyDB.
- C . Transform relevant customer data into vector embeddings and store them in Vertex AI Search for retrieval by the LLM.
- D . Create a caching layer between the chatbot and the Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL database to store frequently accessed customer data. Configure the chatbot server to query the cache.
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
A caching layer is essential to reduce database access time, meeting the <100ms requirement. Caches store high-frequency, low-latency queries in memory, minimizing access delays caused by database lookups. While AlloyDB (Option B) provides performance benefits, a caching layer is more efficient and cost-effective for this purpose. BigQuery ML (Option A) is less ideal for real-time personalized responses due to access speed, and vector embeddings (Option C) are not needed unless semantic search is a requirement.
D
Explanation:
A caching layer is essential to reduce database access time, meeting the <100ms requirement. Caches store high-frequency, low-latency queries in memory, minimizing access delays caused by database lookups. While AlloyDB (Option B) provides performance benefits, a caching layer is more efficient and cost-effective for this purpose. BigQuery ML (Option A) is less ideal for real-time personalized responses due to access speed, and vector embeddings (Option C) are not needed unless semantic search is a requirement.
Question #146
Your organization’s marketing team is building a customer recommendation chatbot that uses a generative AI large language model (LLM) to provide personalized product suggestions in real time. The chatbot needs to access data from millions of customers, including purchase history, browsing behavior, and preferences. The data is stored in a Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL database. You need the chatbot response time to be less than 100ms.
How should you design the system?
- A . Use BigQuery ML to fine-tune the LLM with the data in the Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL database, and access the model from BigQuery.
- B . Replicate the Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL database to AlloyDB. Configure the chatbot server to query AlloyDB.
- C . Transform relevant customer data into vector embeddings and store them in Vertex AI Search for retrieval by the LLM.
- D . Create a caching layer between the chatbot and the Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL database to store frequently accessed customer data. Configure the chatbot server to query the cache.
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
A caching layer is essential to reduce database access time, meeting the <100ms requirement. Caches store high-frequency, low-latency queries in memory, minimizing access delays caused by database lookups. While AlloyDB (Option B) provides performance benefits, a caching layer is more efficient and cost-effective for this purpose. BigQuery ML (Option A) is less ideal for real-time personalized responses due to access speed, and vector embeddings (Option C) are not needed unless semantic search is a requirement.
D
Explanation:
A caching layer is essential to reduce database access time, meeting the <100ms requirement. Caches store high-frequency, low-latency queries in memory, minimizing access delays caused by database lookups. While AlloyDB (Option B) provides performance benefits, a caching layer is more efficient and cost-effective for this purpose. BigQuery ML (Option A) is less ideal for real-time personalized responses due to access speed, and vector embeddings (Option C) are not needed unless semantic search is a requirement.
Question #146
Your organization’s marketing team is building a customer recommendation chatbot that uses a generative AI large language model (LLM) to provide personalized product suggestions in real time. The chatbot needs to access data from millions of customers, including purchase history, browsing behavior, and preferences. The data is stored in a Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL database. You need the chatbot response time to be less than 100ms.
How should you design the system?
- A . Use BigQuery ML to fine-tune the LLM with the data in the Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL database, and access the model from BigQuery.
- B . Replicate the Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL database to AlloyDB. Configure the chatbot server to query AlloyDB.
- C . Transform relevant customer data into vector embeddings and store them in Vertex AI Search for retrieval by the LLM.
- D . Create a caching layer between the chatbot and the Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL database to store frequently accessed customer data. Configure the chatbot server to query the cache.
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
A caching layer is essential to reduce database access time, meeting the <100ms requirement. Caches store high-frequency, low-latency queries in memory, minimizing access delays caused by database lookups. While AlloyDB (Option B) provides performance benefits, a caching layer is more efficient and cost-effective for this purpose. BigQuery ML (Option A) is less ideal for real-time personalized responses due to access speed, and vector embeddings (Option C) are not needed unless semantic search is a requirement.
D
Explanation:
A caching layer is essential to reduce database access time, meeting the <100ms requirement. Caches store high-frequency, low-latency queries in memory, minimizing access delays caused by database lookups. While AlloyDB (Option B) provides performance benefits, a caching layer is more efficient and cost-effective for this purpose. BigQuery ML (Option A) is less ideal for real-time personalized responses due to access speed, and vector embeddings (Option C) are not needed unless semantic search is a requirement.
Question #149
Your company manages a video sharing website where users can watch and upload videos. You need to create an ML model to predict which newly uploaded videos will be the most popular so that those videos can be prioritized on your company’s website.
Which result should you use to determine whether the model is successful?
- A . The model predicts videos as popular if the user who uploads them has over 10,000 likes.
- B . The model predicts 97.5% of the most popular clickbait videos measured by number of clicks.
- C . The model predicts 95% of the most popular videos measured by watch time within 30 days of being uploaded.
- D . The Pearson correlation coefficient between the log-transformed number of views after 7 days and 30 days after publication is equal to 0.
Correct Answer: C
C
Explanation:
In this scenario, the goal is to create an ML model to predict which newly uploaded videos will be the most popular on a video sharing website. The result that should be used to determine whether the model is successful is the one that best aligns with the business objective and the evaluation metric.
Option C is the correct answer because it defines the most popular videos as the ones that have the highest watch time within 30 days of being uploaded, and it sets a high accuracy threshold of 95% for the model prediction.
Option C: The model predicts 95% of the most popular videos measured by watch time within 30 days of being uploaded. This option is the best result for the scenario because it reflects the business objective and the evaluation metric. The business objective is to prioritize the videos that will attract and retain the most viewers on the website. The watch time is a good indicator of the viewer engagement and satisfaction, as it measures how long the viewers watch the videos. The 30-day window is a reasonable time frame to capture the popularity trend of the videos, as it accounts for the initial interest and the viral potential of the videos. The 95% accuracy threshold is a high standard for the model prediction, as it means that the model can correctly identify 95 out of 100 of the most popular videos based on the watch time metric.
Option A: The model predicts videos as popular if the user who uploads them has over 10,000 likes. This option is not a good result for the scenario because it does not reflect the business objective or the evaluation metric. The business objective is to prioritize the videos that will be the most popular on the website, not the users who upload them. The number of likes that a user has is not a good indicator of the popularity of their videos, as it does not measure the viewer engagement or satisfaction with the videos. Moreover, this option does not specify a time frame or an accuracy threshold for the model prediction, making it vague and unreliable.
Option B: The model predicts 97.5% of the most popular clickbait videos measured by number of clicks. This option is not a good result for the scenario because it does not reflect the business objective or the evaluation metric. The business objective is to prioritize the videos that will be the most popular on the website, not the videos that have the most misleading or sensational titles or thumbnails. The number of clicks that a video has is not a good indicator of the popularity of the video, as it does not measure the viewer engagement or satisfaction with the video content. Moreover, this option only focuses on the clickbait videos, which may not represent the majority or the diversity of the videos on the website.
Option D: The Pearson correlation coefficient between the log-transformed number of views after 7 days and 30 days after publication is equal to 0. This option is not a good result for the scenario because it does not reflect the business objective or the evaluation metric. The business objective is to prioritize the videos that will be the most popular on the website, not the videos that have the most consistent or inconsistent number of views over time. The Pearson correlation coefficient is a metric that measures the linear relationship between two variables, not the popularity of the videos. A correlation coefficient of 0 means that there is no linear relationship between the log-transformed number of views after 7 days and 30 days, which does not indicate whether the videos are popular or not. Moreover, this option does not specify a threshold or a target value for the correlation coefficient, making it meaningless and irrelevant.
C
Explanation:
In this scenario, the goal is to create an ML model to predict which newly uploaded videos will be the most popular on a video sharing website. The result that should be used to determine whether the model is successful is the one that best aligns with the business objective and the evaluation metric.
Option C is the correct answer because it defines the most popular videos as the ones that have the highest watch time within 30 days of being uploaded, and it sets a high accuracy threshold of 95% for the model prediction.
Option C: The model predicts 95% of the most popular videos measured by watch time within 30 days of being uploaded. This option is the best result for the scenario because it reflects the business objective and the evaluation metric. The business objective is to prioritize the videos that will attract and retain the most viewers on the website. The watch time is a good indicator of the viewer engagement and satisfaction, as it measures how long the viewers watch the videos. The 30-day window is a reasonable time frame to capture the popularity trend of the videos, as it accounts for the initial interest and the viral potential of the videos. The 95% accuracy threshold is a high standard for the model prediction, as it means that the model can correctly identify 95 out of 100 of the most popular videos based on the watch time metric.
Option A: The model predicts videos as popular if the user who uploads them has over 10,000 likes. This option is not a good result for the scenario because it does not reflect the business objective or the evaluation metric. The business objective is to prioritize the videos that will be the most popular on the website, not the users who upload them. The number of likes that a user has is not a good indicator of the popularity of their videos, as it does not measure the viewer engagement or satisfaction with the videos. Moreover, this option does not specify a time frame or an accuracy threshold for the model prediction, making it vague and unreliable.
Option B: The model predicts 97.5% of the most popular clickbait videos measured by number of clicks. This option is not a good result for the scenario because it does not reflect the business objective or the evaluation metric. The business objective is to prioritize the videos that will be the most popular on the website, not the videos that have the most misleading or sensational titles or thumbnails. The number of clicks that a video has is not a good indicator of the popularity of the video, as it does not measure the viewer engagement or satisfaction with the video content. Moreover, this option only focuses on the clickbait videos, which may not represent the majority or the diversity of the videos on the website.
Option D: The Pearson correlation coefficient between the log-transformed number of views after 7 days and 30 days after publication is equal to 0. This option is not a good result for the scenario because it does not reflect the business objective or the evaluation metric. The business objective is to prioritize the videos that will be the most popular on the website, not the videos that have the most consistent or inconsistent number of views over time. The Pearson correlation coefficient is a metric that measures the linear relationship between two variables, not the popularity of the videos. A correlation coefficient of 0 means that there is no linear relationship between the log-transformed number of views after 7 days and 30 days, which does not indicate whether the videos are popular or not. Moreover, this option does not specify a threshold or a target value for the correlation coefficient, making it meaningless and irrelevant.
Question #150
You work for a global footwear retailer and need to predict when an item will be out of stock based on historical inventory data. Customer behavior is highly dynamic since footwear demand is influenced by many different factors. You want to serve models that are trained on all available data, but track your performance on specific subsets of data before pushing to production.
What is the most streamlined and reliable way to perform this validation?
- A . Use the TFX ModelValidator tools to specify performance metrics for production readiness
- B . Use k-fold cross-validation as a validation strategy to ensure that your model is ready for production.
- C . Use the last relevant week of data as a validation set to ensure that your model is performing accurately on current data
- D . Use the entire dataset and treat the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC ROC) as the main metric.
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
TFX ModelValidator is a tool that allows you to compare new models against a baseline model and evaluate their performance on different metrics and data slices1. You can use this tool to validate your models before deploying them to production and ensure that they meet your expectations and requirements.
k-fold cross-validation is a technique that splits the data into k subsets and trains the model on k-1 subsets while testing it on the remaining subset. This is repeated k times and the average performance is reported2. This technique is useful for estimating the generalization error of a model, but it does not account for the dynamic nature of customer behavior or the potential changes in data distribution over time.
Using the last relevant week of data as a validation set is a simple way to check the model’s performance on recent data, but it may not be representative of the entire data or capture the long-term trends and patterns. It also does not allow you to compare the model with a baseline or evaluate it on different data slices.
Using the entire dataset and treating the AUC ROC as the main metric is not a good practice because it does not leave any data for validation or testing. It also assumes that the AUC ROC is the only metric that matters, which may not be true for your business problem. You may want to consider other metrics such as precision, recall, or revenue.
A
Explanation:
TFX ModelValidator is a tool that allows you to compare new models against a baseline model and evaluate their performance on different metrics and data slices1. You can use this tool to validate your models before deploying them to production and ensure that they meet your expectations and requirements.
k-fold cross-validation is a technique that splits the data into k subsets and trains the model on k-1 subsets while testing it on the remaining subset. This is repeated k times and the average performance is reported2. This technique is useful for estimating the generalization error of a model, but it does not account for the dynamic nature of customer behavior or the potential changes in data distribution over time.
Using the last relevant week of data as a validation set is a simple way to check the model’s performance on recent data, but it may not be representative of the entire data or capture the long-term trends and patterns. It also does not allow you to compare the model with a baseline or evaluate it on different data slices.
Using the entire dataset and treating the AUC ROC as the main metric is not a good practice because it does not leave any data for validation or testing. It also assumes that the AUC ROC is the only metric that matters, which may not be true for your business problem. You may want to consider other metrics such as precision, recall, or revenue.