CIPS L6M1 Practice Exams
Last updated on Oct 22,2026- Exam Code: L6M1
- Exam Name: Strategic Ethical Leadership
- Certification Provider: CIPS
- Latest update: Oct 22,2026
SIMULATION
Fred has recently been promoted from a Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company. Having worked in the procurement department of Silly Name Company for over 15 years, he has many ideas of how to improve the department, some of them radical.
How can Fred assess the readiness of the department to change? How would this impact his decisions to introduce his desired changes? (25 points)
Fred’s recent promotion from Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company presents him with an opportunity to implement his ideas for departmental improvement. However, as someone who has worked in the same organization for 15 years, Fred must first assess the department’s readiness for change before implementing radical reforms. Failure to do so could lead to resistance, disruption, and inefficiency. This essay explores how Fred can evaluate change readiness, and how this assessment will influence his decision-making.
Assessing the Readiness for Change
To successfully introduce changes in procurement, Fred must evaluate key factors that determine whether the department is ready to accept and implement new ideas.
SIMULATION
Fred has recently been promoted from a Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company. Having worked in the procurement department of Silly Name Company for over 15 years, he has many ideas of how to improve the department, some of them radical.
How can Fred assess the readiness of the department to change? How would this impact his decisions to introduce his desired changes? (25 points)
Fred’s recent promotion from Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company presents him with an opportunity to implement his ideas for departmental improvement. However, as someone who has worked in the same organization for 15 years, Fred must first assess the department’s readiness for change before implementing radical reforms. Failure to do so could lead to resistance, disruption, and inefficiency. This essay explores how Fred can evaluate change readiness, and how this assessment will influence his decision-making.
Assessing the Readiness for Change
To successfully introduce changes in procurement, Fred must evaluate key factors that determine whether the department is ready to accept and implement new ideas.
SIMULATION
Fred has recently been promoted from a Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company. Having worked in the procurement department of Silly Name Company for over 15 years, he has many ideas of how to improve the department, some of them radical.
How can Fred assess the readiness of the department to change? How would this impact his decisions to introduce his desired changes? (25 points)
Fred’s recent promotion from Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company presents him with an opportunity to implement his ideas for departmental improvement. However, as someone who has worked in the same organization for 15 years, Fred must first assess the department’s readiness for change before implementing radical reforms. Failure to do so could lead to resistance, disruption, and inefficiency. This essay explores how Fred can evaluate change readiness, and how this assessment will influence his decision-making.
Assessing the Readiness for Change
To successfully introduce changes in procurement, Fred must evaluate key factors that determine whether the department is ready to accept and implement new ideas.
SIMULATION
Fred has recently been promoted from a Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company. Having worked in the procurement department of Silly Name Company for over 15 years, he has many ideas of how to improve the department, some of them radical.
How can Fred assess the readiness of the department to change? How would this impact his decisions to introduce his desired changes? (25 points)
Fred’s recent promotion from Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company presents him with an opportunity to implement his ideas for departmental improvement. However, as someone who has worked in the same organization for 15 years, Fred must first assess the department’s readiness for change before implementing radical reforms. Failure to do so could lead to resistance, disruption, and inefficiency. This essay explores how Fred can evaluate change readiness, and how this assessment will influence his decision-making.
Assessing the Readiness for Change
To successfully introduce changes in procurement, Fred must evaluate key factors that determine whether the department is ready to accept and implement new ideas.
SIMULATION
Fred has recently been promoted from a Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company. Having worked in the procurement department of Silly Name Company for over 15 years, he has many ideas of how to improve the department, some of them radical.
How can Fred assess the readiness of the department to change? How would this impact his decisions to introduce his desired changes? (25 points)
Fred’s recent promotion from Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company presents him with an opportunity to implement his ideas for departmental improvement. However, as someone who has worked in the same organization for 15 years, Fred must first assess the department’s readiness for change before implementing radical reforms. Failure to do so could lead to resistance, disruption, and inefficiency. This essay explores how Fred can evaluate change readiness, and how this assessment will influence his decision-making.
Assessing the Readiness for Change
To successfully introduce changes in procurement, Fred must evaluate key factors that determine whether the department is ready to accept and implement new ideas.
SIMULATION
Fred has recently been promoted from a Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company. Having worked in the procurement department of Silly Name Company for over 15 years, he has many ideas of how to improve the department, some of them radical.
How can Fred assess the readiness of the department to change? How would this impact his decisions to introduce his desired changes? (25 points)
Fred’s recent promotion from Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company presents him with an opportunity to implement his ideas for departmental improvement. However, as someone who has worked in the same organization for 15 years, Fred must first assess the department’s readiness for change before implementing radical reforms. Failure to do so could lead to resistance, disruption, and inefficiency. This essay explores how Fred can evaluate change readiness, and how this assessment will influence his decision-making.
Assessing the Readiness for Change
To successfully introduce changes in procurement, Fred must evaluate key factors that determine whether the department is ready to accept and implement new ideas.
SIMULATION
Fred has recently been promoted from a Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company. Having worked in the procurement department of Silly Name Company for over 15 years, he has many ideas of how to improve the department, some of them radical.
How can Fred assess the readiness of the department to change? How would this impact his decisions to introduce his desired changes? (25 points)
Fred’s recent promotion from Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company presents him with an opportunity to implement his ideas for departmental improvement. However, as someone who has worked in the same organization for 15 years, Fred must first assess the department’s readiness for change before implementing radical reforms. Failure to do so could lead to resistance, disruption, and inefficiency. This essay explores how Fred can evaluate change readiness, and how this assessment will influence his decision-making.
Assessing the Readiness for Change
To successfully introduce changes in procurement, Fred must evaluate key factors that determine whether the department is ready to accept and implement new ideas.
SIMULATION
Explain how a procurement professional can ‘Manage in 4 Directions’ (15 points) How can they use Active Listening to assist with this? (10 points)
In procurement, leadership is not limited to managing subordinates; it extends to managing in four directions: managing upward (superiors), managing downward (subordinates), managing laterally (peers), and managing externally (suppliers and stakeholders). Each direction presents unique challenges and requires tailored strategies. Additionally, active listening plays a crucial role in effective management, fostering better communication, trust, and decision-making.
Managing in Four Directions (15 Points)
SIMULATION
Explain how a procurement professional can ‘Manage in 4 Directions’ (15 points) How can they use Active Listening to assist with this? (10 points)
In procurement, leadership is not limited to managing subordinates; it extends to managing in four directions: managing upward (superiors), managing downward (subordinates), managing laterally (peers), and managing externally (suppliers and stakeholders). Each direction presents unique challenges and requires tailored strategies. Additionally, active listening plays a crucial role in effective management, fostering better communication, trust, and decision-making.
Managing in Four Directions (15 Points)
SIMULATION
Explain how a procurement professional can ‘Manage in 4 Directions’ (15 points) How can they use Active Listening to assist with this? (10 points)
In procurement, leadership is not limited to managing subordinates; it extends to managing in four directions: managing upward (superiors), managing downward (subordinates), managing laterally (peers), and managing externally (suppliers and stakeholders). Each direction presents unique challenges and requires tailored strategies. Additionally, active listening plays a crucial role in effective management, fostering better communication, trust, and decision-making.
Managing in Four Directions (15 Points)