PECB GDPR Practice Exams
Last updated on Oct 22,2026- Exam Code: GDPR
- Exam Name: PECB Certified Data Protection Officer
- Certification Provider: PECB
- Latest update: Oct 22,2026
Scenario 8:
MA store is an online clothing retailer founded in 2010. They provide quality products at a
reasonable cost. One thing that differentiates MA store from other online shopping sites is their excellent customer service.
MA store follows a customer-centered business approach. They have created a user-friendly website with well-organized content that is accessible to everyone. Through innovative ideas and services, MA store offers a seamless user experience for visitors while also attracting new customers. When visiting the website, customers can filter their search results by price, size, customer reviews, and other features. One of MA store’s strategies for providing, personalizing, and improving its products is data analytics. MA store tracks and analyzes the user actions on its website so it can create customized experience for visitors.
In order to understand their target audience, MA store analyzes shopping preferences of its customers based on their purchase history. The purchase history includes the product that was bought, shipping updates, and payment details. Clients’ personal data and other information related to MA store products included in the purchase history are stored in separate databases. Personal information, such as clients’ address or payment details, are encrypted using a public key. When analyzing the shopping preferences of customers, employees access only the information about the product while the identity of customers is removed from the data set and replaced with a common value, ensuring that customer identities are protected and cannot be retrieved.
Last year, MA store announced that they suffered a personal data breach where personal data of clients were leaked. The personal data breach was caused by an SQL injection attack which targeted MA store’s web application. The SQL injection was successful since no parameterized queries were used.
Based on this scenario, answer the following Question:
What did MA store use when storing clients’ address and payment details in its system?
- A . Plain text storage
- B . Pseudonymization
- C . Data erasure and disposal
B
Explanation:
MA Store uses encryption with a public key to protect clients’ addresses and payment details, which aligns with the definition of pseudonymization under Article 4(5) of GDPR. Pseudonymization is a technique that reduces the linkability of data subjects to their personal data, thus minimizing the risk of unauthorized access. Encryption is specifically mentioned as a security measure in Article 32(1)(a) of GDPR, reinforcing that personal data should be protected against unauthorized access or breaches.
Scenario 5:
Recpond is a German employment recruiting company. Their services are delivered globally and include consulting and staffing solutions. In the beginning. Recpond provided its services through an office in Germany. Today, they have grown to become one of the largest recruiting agencies, providing employment to more than 500,000 people around the world. Recpond receives most applications through its website. Job searchers are required to provide the job title and location. Then, a list of job opportunities is provided. When a job position is selected, candidates are required to provide their contact details and professional work experience records. During the process, they are informed that the information will be used only for the purposes and period determined by Recpond. Recpond’s experts analyze candidates’ profiles and applications and choose the candidates that are suitable for the job position. The list of the selected candidates is then delivered to Recpond’s clients, who proceed with the recruitment process. Files of candidates that are not selected are stored in Recpond’s databases, including the personal data of candidates who withdraw the consent on which the processing was based. When the GDPR came into force, the company was unprepared. The top management appointed a DPO and consulted him for all data protection issues. The DPO, on the other hand, reported the progress of all data protection activities to the top management. Considering the level of sensitivity of the personal data processed by Recpond, the DPO did not have direct access to the personal data of all clients, unless the top management deemed it necessary. The DPO planned the GDPR implementation by initially analyzing the applicable GDPR requirements. Recpond, on the other hand, initiated a risk assessment to understand the risks associated with processing operations. The risk assessment was conducted based on common risks that employment recruiting companies face. After analyzing different risk scenarios, the level of risk was determined and evaluated. The results were presented to the DPO, who then decided to analyze only the risks that have a greater impact on the company. The DPO concluded that the cost required for treating most of the identified risks was higher than simply accepting them. Based on this analysis, the DPO decided to accept the actual level of the identified risks. After reviewing policies and procedures of the company. Recpond established a new data protection policy. As proposed by the DPO, the information security policy was also updated. These changes were then communicated to all employees of Recpond. Based on this scenario, answer the following Question:
Question:
According to scenario 5, the DPO decided to accept most of the identified risks related to data processing. Is this acceptable under GDPR?
- A . Yes, the cost required for implementing appropriate risk controls was higher than simply deciding to accept them.
- B . No, the DPO should have been involved in all risk management activities to select an appropriate risk treatment option.
- C . No, the DPO’s role in risk management is to help the company select a risk treatment option, not take final decisions on risk acceptance.
- D . Yes, but only if the DPO received explicit approval from the supervisory authority.
C
Explanation:
Under Article 39 of GDPR, the DPO’s role is to monitor and advise but not make risk acceptance decisions. Risk management is the responsibility of the controller.
Option C is correct because DPOs provide guidance on risk, but the organization decides risk treatment.
Option A is incorrect because risk acceptance is not a decision for the DPO.
Option B is incorrect because DPOs do not manage risk directly but provide recommendations.
Option D is incorrect because supervisory authorities do not approve risk acceptance decisions.
Reference: GDPR Article 39(1)(b) (DPO’s advisory role in risk management)
Recital 97 (DPO’s independence)
Scenario 7: EduCCS is an online education platform based in Netherlands. EduCCS helps organizations find, manage, and deliver their corporate training. Most of EduCCS’s clients are EU residents. EduCCS is one of the few education organizations that have achieved GDPR compliance since 2019. Their DPO is a full-time employee who has been engaged in most data protection processes within the organization. In addition to facilitating GDPR compliance, the DPO acts as an intermediary point between EduCCS and other relevant interested parties. EduCCS’s users can benefit from the variety of up-to-date training library and the possibility of accessing it through their phones, tablets, or computers. EduCCS’s services are offered through two main platforms: online learning and digital training. To use one of these platforms, users should sign on EduCCS’s website by providing their personal information. Online learning is a platform in which employees of other organizations can search for and request the training they need. Through its digital training platform, on the other hand, EduCCS manages the entire training and education program for other organizations. Organizations that need this type of service need to provide information about their core activities and areas where training sessions are needed. This information is then analyzed by EduCCS and a customized training program is provided. In the beginning, all IT-related services were managed by two employees of EduCCS. However, after acquiring a large number of clients, managing these services became challenging That is why EduCCS decided to outsource the IT service function to X-Tech. X-Tech provides IT support and is responsible for ensuring the security of EduCCS’s network and systems. In addition, X-Tech stores and archives EduCCS’s information including their training programs and clients’ and employees’ data. Recently, X-Tech made headlines in the technology press for being a victim of a phishing attack. A group of three attackers hacked X-Tech’s systems via a phishing campaign which targeted the employees of the Marketing Department. By compromising X-Tech’s mail server, hackers were able to gain access to more than 200 computer systems. Consequently, access to the networks of EduCCS’s clients was also allowed. Using EduCCS’s employee accounts, attackers installed a remote access tool on EduCCS’s compromised systems. By doing so, they gained access to personal information of EduCCS’s clients, training programs, and other information stored in its online payment system. The attack was detected by X-Tech’s system administrator. After detecting unusual activity in X-Tech’s network, they immediately reported it to the incident management team of the company. One week after being notified about the personal data breach, EduCCS communicated the incident to the supervisory authority with a document that outlined the reasons for the delay revealing that due to the lack of regular testing or modification, their incident response plan was not adequately prepared to handle such an attack. Based on this scenario, answer the following Question:
Question:
Should EduCCS document information related to the personal data breach, including facts, its impact, and the remedial action taken?
- A . Yes, EduCCS should document any personal data breach to enable the supervisory authority to verify compliance with GDPR’s Article 33 (Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority).
- B . Yes, EduCCS should document the personal data breach to allow the supervisory authority to determine if the breach must be communicated to data subjects.
- C . No, EduCCS was not the direct target of the attack, so it cannot document details about the breach, its impact, or remedial actions.
- D . No, EduCCS must report the breach only if more than 100,000 individuals were affected.
A
Explanation:
Under Article 33(5) of GDPR, controllers must document personal data breaches, including their effects and corrective measures, even if notification to data subjects is not required.
Option A is correct because documentation is mandatory for compliance verification.
Option B is incorrect because documentation is required regardless of whether notification to data subjects is necessary.
Option C is incorrect because EduCCS, as the controller, is responsible for breach documentation.
Option D is incorrect because GDPR does not impose a breach reporting threshold based on the number of affected individuals.
Reference: GDPR Article 33(5) (Documentation of breaches)
Recital 85 (Controllers must record breaches and mitigation actions)
Scenario: 2
Soyled is a retail company that sells a wide range of electronic products from top European brands. It primarily sells its products in its online platforms (which include customer reviews and ratings), despite using physical stores since 2015. Soyled’s website and mobile app are used by millions of customers. Soyled has employed various solutions to create a customer-focused ecosystem and facilitate growth. Soyled uses customer relationship management (CRM) software to analyze user data and administer the interaction with customers. The software allows the company to store customer information, identify sales opportunities, and manage marketing campaigns. It automatically obtains information about each user’s IP address and web browser cookies. Soyled also uses the software to collect behavioral data, such as users’ repeated actions and mouse movement information. Customers must create an account to buy from Soyled’s online platforms. To do so, they fill out a standard sign-up form of three mandatory boxes (name, surname, email address) and a non-mandatory one (phone number). When the user clicks the email address box, a pop-up message appears as follows: “Soyled needs your email address to grant you access to your account and contact you about any changes related to your account and our website. For further information, please read our privacy policy.’ When the user clicks the phone number box, the following message appears: “Soyled may use your phone number to provide text updates on the order status. The phone number may also be used by the shipping courier." Once the personal data is provided, customers create a username and password, which are used to access Soyled’s website or app. When customers want to make a purchase, they are also required to provide their bank account details. When the user finally creates the account, the following message appears: “Soyled collects
only the personal data it needs for the following purposes: processing orders, managing accounts, and personalizing customers’ experience. The collected data is shared with our network and used for marketing purposes." Soyled uses personal data to promote sales and its brand. If a user decides to close the account, the personal data is still used for marketing purposes only. Last month, the company received an email from John, a customer, claiming that his personal data was being used for purposes other than those specified by the company. According to the email, Soyled was using the data for direct marketing purposes. John requested details on how his personal data was collected, stored, and processed. Based on this scenario, answer the following Question:
Question:
Based on scenario 2, Soyled only has three mandatory fields in its sign-up form. On which GDPR principle is this decision based?
- A . Lawfulness, fairness, and transparency
- B . Purpose limitation
- C . Data minimization
- D . Storage limitation
C
Explanation:
Under Article 5(1)(c) of GDPR, the data minimization principle states that personal data must be adequate, relevant, and limited to what is necessary for processing.
Soyled’s decision to have only three mandatory fields (name, surname, and email) aligns with data minimization since it only collects the minimum data needed for account creation.
Option C is correct.
Option A is incorrect as transparency relates to informing users.
Option B is incorrect because purpose limitation focuses on using data only for specific purposes.
Option D is incorrect because storage limitation concerns data retention periods.
Reference: GDPR Article 5(1)(c) (Data minimization principle)
Recital 39 (Limiting data collection to necessity)
Scenario:
A marketing company discovers that an unauthorized party accessed its customer database, exposing 5,000 records containing names, email addresses, and phone numbers. The breach occurred due to a misconfigured server.
Question:
To comply with GDPR, which information must the company include in its notification to the supervisory authority?
- A . A description of the nature of the personal data breach.
- B . The approximate number of data subjects and records affected.
- C . Both A and B.
- D . The identity of the attacker and their potential motive.
C
Explanation:
Under Article 33(3) of GDPR, a breach notification to the supervisory authority must include:
The nature of the breach (what type of data was accessed).
The number of affected individuals and records.
The potential impact on data subjects.
Measures taken to mitigate the breach.
Option C is correct because both the nature of the breach and the number of affected individuals must be reported.
Option A is incorrect because while the breach description is necessary, the number of affected
individuals must also be included.
Option B is incorrect because the breach description is also required.
Option D is incorrect because identifying the attacker is not required under GDPR.
Reference: GDPR Article 33(3) (Content requirements for breach notification)
Recital 87 (Timely reporting ensures risk mitigation)
Question:
You work in a company that provides training services. One of the clients requests access to information about the categories of recipients to whom their personal data will be disclosed.
What actions should you take to be compliant with GDPR?
- A . Obtain authorization from the recipients before disclosing their identities.
- B . Verify the identity of the client by sending login data to their mailing address.
- C . Inform the client that access to this type of information is not allowed, since it may result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of recipients.
- D . Provide the client with the requested information about the recipients of their data.
D
Explanation:
Under Article 15(1)(c) of GDPR, data subjects have the right to access information about the recipients or categories of recipients who have received their personal data.
Option D is correct because GDPR mandates transparency regarding data sharing.
Option A is incorrect because authorization from recipients is not required before disclosing their categories.
Option B is incorrect because identity verification applies to access requests but is not a prerequisite for providing recipient information.
Option C is incorrect because denying access to this information violates the data subject’s right under GDPR.
Reference: GDPR Article 15(1)(c) (Right of access to recipient categories)
Recital 63 (Transparency in processing and access rights)
Question:
According to Article 82 of GDPR, when must a processor be held liable for damage caused by processing?
- A . Only when it has not complied with the data subject’s requirements.
- B . Only when it has acted outside of or contrary to the lawful instructions of the controller.
- C . Only when the processing of data has not been done based on the instructions received by the organization’s DPO.
- D . Processors are never liable, as only controllers are responsible for data protection compliance.
B
Explanation:
Under Article 82(2) of GDPR, processors can be held liable for data breaches if they act outside or against the controller’s instructions. Processors must comply with the controller’s directives or be held accountable.
Option B is correct because processors are liable if they fail to follow the controller’s instructions.
Option A is incorrect because processors do not take instructions directly from data subjects.
Option C is incorrect because DPOs do not issue legally binding instructions to processors.
Option D is incorrect because processors share liability under GDPR.
Reference: GDPR Article 82(2) (Processor liability for non-compliance)
Recital 146 (Joint liability between controllers and processors)
Scenario 3:
COR Bank is an international banking group that operates in 31 countries. It was formed as the merger of two well-known investment banks in Germany. Their two main fields of business are retail and investment banking. COR Bank provides innovative solutions for services such as payments, cash management, savings, protection insurance, and real-estate services. COR Bank has a large number of clients and transactions. Therefore, they process large information, including clients’ personal data. Some of the data from the application processes of COR Bank, including archived data, is operated by Tibko, an IT services company located in Canada. To ensure compliance with the GDPR, COR Bank and Tibko have reached a data processing agreement Based on the agreement, the purpose and conditions of data processing are determined by COR Bank. However, Tibko is allowed to make technical decisions for storing the data based on its own expertise. COR Bank aims to remain a trustworthy bank and a long-term partner for its clients. Therefore, they devote special attention to legal compliance. They started the implementation process of a GDPR compliance program in 2018. The first step was to analyze the existing resources and procedures. Lisa was appointed as the data protection officer (DPO). Being the information security manager of COR Bank for many years, Lisa had knowledge of the organization’s core activities. She was previously involved in most of the processes related to information systems management and data protection. Lisa played a key role in achieving compliance to the GDPR by advising the company regarding data protection obligations and creating a data protection strategy. After obtaining evidence of the existing data protection policy, Lisa proposed to adapt the policy to specific requirements of GDPR. Then, Lisa implemented the updates of the policy within COR Bank. To ensure consistency between processes of different departments within the organization, Lisa has constantly communicated with all heads of GDPR. Then, Lisa implemented the updates of the policy within COR Bank. To ensure consistency between processes of different departments within the organization, Lisa has constantly communicated with all heads of departments. As the DPO, she had access to several departments, including HR and Accounting Department. This assured the organization that there was a continuous cooperation between them. The activities of some departments within COR Bank are closely related to data protection. Therefore, considering their expertise, Lisa was advised from the top management to take orders from the heads of those departments when taking decisions related to their field. Based on this scenario, answer the following Question:
Question:
Considering the GDPR’s territorial scope and the data processing agreement between COR Bank and Tibko, which of the following best describes Tibko’s obligations under the GDPR?
- A . Tibko’s compliance with GDPR is limited to implementing technical safeguards for data storage, as stipulated by the data processing agreement with COR Bank.
- B . Tibko must adhere to all GDPR provisions independently, including determining the purpose of processing personal data, as a processor acting under COR Bank’s authority.
- C . Tibko is required to comply with the GDPR because it processes personal data on behalf of COR Bank, and COR Bank determines the purpose of processing under their agreement.
- D . Tibko is not subject to GDPR since it is located outside the EU and only provides IT services.
C
Explanation:
Under Article 3(2) of GDPR, GDPR applies extraterritorially if an entity outside the EU processes personal data of EU residents on behalf of a controller subject to GDPR. Tibko processes COR Bank’s client data, making it subject to GDPR as a processor under Article 28.
Option C is correct because Tibko must comply with GDPR since it processes EU data on behalf of COR Bank.
Option A is incorrect because processors must comply with broader GDPR obligations, not just technical safeguards.
Option B is incorrect because processors do not determine the purpose of processing; that is the controller’s responsibility.
Option D is incorrect because location outside the EU does not exempt processors from GDPR obligations.
Reference: GDPR Article 3(2) (Territorial Scope)
GDPR Article 28(1) (Processor obligations)
Recital 81 (Processor responsibilities)
Question:
What is the role of the European Data Protection Board (EDPB)?
- A . To supervise and monitor the application of GDPR within the EU.
- B . To advise the European Commission regarding data protection issues in the EU.
- C . To negotiate and adopt EU laws as per the proposals from the European Commission.
- D . To conduct audits on organizations suspected of GDPR violations.
B
Explanation:
Under Article 70 of GDPR, the EDPB is responsible for ensuring consistency in GDPR application and advising the European Commission on data protection matters.
Option B is correct because the EDPB provides opinions and guidelines on GDPR implementation.
Option A is incorrect because supervision and enforcement are the responsibility of national supervisory authorities, not the EDPB.
Option C is incorrect because EU laws are adopted by the European Parliament and Council, not the EDPB.
Option D is incorrect because the EDPB does not conduct audits; national data protection authorities do.
Reference: GDPR Article 70(1)(b) (EDPB’s advisory role)
Recital 139 (EDPB ensures consistency in GDPR application)
Scenario 9:
Soin is a French travel agency with the largest network of professional travel agents throughout Europe. They aim to create unique vacations for clients regardless of the destinations they seek. The company specializes in helping people find plane tickets, reservations at hotels, cruises, and other activities.
As any other industry, travel is no exception when it comes to GDPR compliance. Soin was directly affected by the enforcement of GDPR since its main activities require the collection and processing of customers’ data. Data collected by Soin includes customer’s ID or passport details, financial and payment information, and contact information. This type of data is defined as personal by the GDPR; hence, Soin’s data processing activities are built based on customer’s consent.
At the beginning, as for many other companies, GDPR compliance was a complicated issue for Soin. However, the process was completed within a few months and later on the company appointed a DPO. Last year, the supervisory authority of France, requested the conduct of a data protection external audit in Soin without an early notice. To ensure GDPR compliance before an external audit was conducted, Soin organized an internal audit. The data protection internal audit was conducted by the DPO of the company. The audit was initiated by firstly confirming the accuracy of records related to all current Soin’s data processing activities. The DPO considered that verifying compliance to Article 30 of GDPR would help in defining the data protection internal audit scope. The DPO noticed that not all processing activities of Soin were documented as required by the GDPR. For example, processing activities records of the company did not include a description of transfers of personal data to third countries. In addition, there was no clear description of categories of personal data processed by the company. Other areas that were audited included content of data protection policy, data retention guidelines, how sensitive data is stored, and security policies and practices. The DPO conducted interviews with some employees at different levels of the company. During the audit, the DPO came across some emails sent by Soin’s clients claiming that they do not have access in their personal data stored by Soin. Soin’s Customer Service Department answered the emails saying that, based on Soin’s policies, a client cannot have access to personal data stored by the company. Based on the information gathered, the DPO concluded that there was a lack of employee awareness on the GDPR.
All these findings were documented in the audit report. Once the audit was completed, the DPO drafted action plans to resolve the nonconformities found. Firstly, the DPO created a new procedure which could ensure the right of access to clients. All employees were provided with GDPR compliance awareness sessions. Moreover, the DPO established a document which described the transfer of personal data to third countries and the applicability of safeguards when this transfer is done to an international organization.
Based on this scenario, answer the following Question:
Based on scenario 9, the supervisory authority requested the conduct of a data protection audit in Soin without early notice. Is this acceptable?
- A . No, the supervisory authority can conduct a data protection external audit only if it is requested by the controller
- B . Yes, the supervisory authority may perform external audits randomly or after notification of the occurrence of a data breach in the company
- C . No, the supervisory authority may perform only scheduled external audits with at least two weeks’ notice after the occurrence of a data breach in the company
B
Explanation:
Under GDPR Article 58(1)(b) and (d), supervisory authorities have the power to carry out data protection audits at their discretion. They do not need prior approval from the controller and may act proactively to ensure compliance. Supervisory authorities can investigate companies even without a data breach, especially if there are concerns about GDPR compliance.